The Pathway to Civility: Making Perceptions Match Reality
New research suggests Americans may be way less polarized than they think.
New research suggests Americans may be way less polarized than they think.
Donor-advised funds are under congressional scrutiny today with pending federal legislation aimed at, among other things, limiting donor privacy.
What the public debate about Critical Race Theory has largely missed is that any federal control over curricula violates federal law, including the very statute under which the Department of Education was founded in 1979.
In light of ongoing criticisms of donor-advised funds and their growing popularity as a flexible giving vehicle, Philanthropy Roundtable interviewed one of the authors of a new research report, “The 2024 National Study on Donor Advised Funds.”
Every American should have the freedom to give to the causes they care about the most, with the flexibility to choose how, when and where to give — because this freedom leads to more generosity that improves lives around the country. Unfortunately, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service are expected to propose new rules that will threaten that very freedom, limit options and flexibility for charitable givers and create barriers for donors and nonprofits alike.
As lawmakers investigate the rare instances of foreign interference in U.S. elections through nonprofits, Philanthropy Roundtable encourages them to protect charitable giving by upholding the constitutional right to donor privacy.
Most Americans steer their charity to efforts to advance the American Dream a philanthropy of inclusion and continuity.
DAFs are effective tools that allow donors to irrevocably commit funds to charitable giving while allowing time for strategic gifts or longer-term appreciation of charitable funds over time.
The Civics Playbook helps connect foundations and individual donors with high-impact organizations dedicated to enhancing civics education across the country.
Coming from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds, over a dozen public commenters spoke passionately about the divisive nature of CRT and its influence on California s ethnic studies curricula.
Family foundations have come under scrutiny on Capitol Hill in recent months as some policymakers have raised questions about whether these foundations are inappropriately allocating administrative funds to benefit family members of the original donor(s).
Today Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) and Rep. Tom Reed (R-N.Y.) introduced the so-called ACE Act which would restrict charitable giving, ultimately reducing the funds available to U.S. charities and the most vulnerable who benefit from them.